Do I Need a Family Lawyer if My Case Is in My Favor
While many married couples relish fairytale endings and lifelong marriages, some spouses cease up trapped in what can feel like a never-catastrophe nightmare. When all efforts to salvage a marriage fail, divorce may exist the but logical stride left. In some divorce cases, both spouses may simply be ready to move on with minimal fuss, just that isn't always the case.
Sometimes, spouses can plough downright nasty to their sometime lovers. When the worst happens, dissolving a marriage can turn into full-on warfare, and no i is safety from the brutality. From lawyers to other involved parties, these Redditors hash out some of the wildest divorce cases they ever saw.
Show Me the Money
The woman issued more than 70 subpoenas to banks, firms, investment companies — you lot name it — because she was convinced he had squirreled abroad $20+ million overseas behind her back. It got so bad that she dug upward receipts from 25 years ago to try to put together this grand conspiracy puzzle.
In the finish, after she racked up $i.5 million in legal fees and used 7 different lawyers, the approximate said information technology was ridiculous. He told her there was no conspiracy, and she wasn't entitled to a portion of this phantom $20 one thousand thousand.
Tchaikovsky08
I saw a future ex-wife fight vigorously over disability benefits of a not-yet-retired career armed forces guy. She had a new guy to bankroll her, and legal fees were zero to her, so she dragged out asset sectionalization and the divorce proceedings for months over non-even so-accrued disability benefits for her soon-to-be ex-hubby.
The total amount she would have been entitled to was about $400. That was before the Supreme Court decided disability benefits are not marital property. It was some very picayune stuff.
AppleJuiceTwo
On the Run
My customer fled the dwelling with her baby after an incident. In my state, both parents have full rights to the children unless a custody order is in place. In other words, whoever has the kid, gets the kid. Police will non arbitrate when 1 spouse is withholding a child from the other spouse if there are no orders in place.
Well, my client had the child for two weeks at her new place when the husband showed up demanding the child. She refused. He called the police. The responding officer was a family friend of both, but originally a friend of the husband. This PO shows upward and decides to try to mediate the conflict. The PO tells my customer something along the lines of "Allow him hug his son goodbye, and he will leave peacefully."
My client was hesitant but agreed. The married man took the kid and exclaimed, "He's mine now!" He ran to his car with the babe — no supplies, no clothes, null. The PO claimed he had no idea what was happening (yeah, right). Since no orders were in place, in that location was nothing my client could do.
While we were trying to rails him down, we got an order returning the kid to my client's possession. He suddenly contacted my client saying he was at a hotel in the expanse. Nosotros sent the police.
thetexasunicorn
Get Your Ain Bag
I had an epic customer who hated his married woman's guts. He was asked to pay an acting maintenance of iii,000 rupees per month. This guy goes to the bank and gets 3,000 rupees — all in 1 Rupee coins — and gives information technology to his wife in courtroom. Technically it's legal. So, the married woman had to sit down and count all the coins in courtroom, and then he says he wants the bag dorsum. Technically, information technology's his bag, so this lady is left with 3,000 coins and no manner to comport it dwelling. This guy was an evil genius.
jaxdood
If Nosotros Could Only Exist That Bankrupt
The husband had a fancy job and got stationed abroad, so the married woman and 2 kids moved with him. He fabricated a actually high salary with all expenses paid, while the wife was a stay-at-home mom with no income of her ain. The matrimony failed, they moved back habitation (Sweden) and the wife sued for pension, which she was entitled to by law, then she would be able to take intendance of the kids every other week. She hadn't worked for a number of years and had a hard time getting back into the job market. She had no savings, etc.
Suddenly, the husband, who basically hasn't had to pay whatever bills for several years, claimed he was also broke. He "only" had around $1 million or so and was "forced" to spend it on an flat in one of the most expensive parts of boondocks so he had somewhere to live.
Ching_chong_parsnip
Bank Account Meant More
The wife had a baby, and the husband has cypher interest in the child and even resents the attending that the kid takes away from him. He tells his wife that she is 100% responsible for this kid, even financially. She realizes he is a terrible parent, and that makes him a terrible partner. She would rather be an actual unmarried parent than deal with his human-babe mess, and so she files a divorce petition.
The married man is told by his lawyer that the more time he spends with his kid, the less child support he will pay. He starts going to doctor appointments, doing child stuff with the kid, you know, beingness a parent. The parties are now divorced, and the husband has l/50 fourth dimension share and is a doting father. All the married woman wanted was for him to have an involvement in the child, merely she had to divorce him to get it.
MrsMayberry
Starting Over from Scratch
I take seen some evil things in Iraq. I of them was when a Joe of mine went to withdraw "soldier pay" while deployed. The finance officer told him he didn't take any more than money in that account. After several months of deployment, he should have had a few thou in at that place, minus what his wife was spending.
His wife was his beneficiary and had ability of attorney over his estate, then she had bought a new house, moved everything out, moved her new boyfriend in, changed her number and had been spending his combat pay for over 4 months. Information technology took near the entire deployment to get back control of his coin, but so he could spend a trivial on deployment.
It took almost a year after deployment for him to locate his married woman and serve her divorce papers. She sold all of his stuff, including a Camaro he had just bought, for pennies on the dollar — his clothes and calculator besides. She literally took him for all he had.
deleted user
Everyone Lost Coin
We represented a wife in a divorce. They had 2 young girls, and the husband had cheated on the wife. Making it worse, the hubby had introduced the daughters to his other adult female before the married woman knew nearly her, which obviously actually hurt her.
This couple didn't have a lot of money. They worked out parenting and segmentation of avails in mediation, except for the gain of sale from their family home. It was simply about $100,000. The married man wanted a fifty/50 split, but the wife wanted a seventy/30 divide in her favor as bounty for the mental anguish caused past his affair. Where I live, mental ache isn't a legit claim for uneven division of money in a divorce, just there are different reasons to claim information technology — all of which tin be complicated to bear witness.
The wife dragged the case out for 16 months, culminating in a five-twenty-four hours trial. The hubby concluded up getting rid of his lawyer, so he was a self rep, merely the married woman connected to retain our business firm throughout. Basically, the difference in what she wanted vs. what he wanted was $20,000. She was successful at trial and was given a 65/35 split up, which meant she got $15,000 more than from the gain of the auction than he did.
All the same, her legal costs at the end of it were $30,000, so she but pocketed $25,000. That's half of what she would have pocketed had she just accustomed his 50/50 split and $10,000 less than what he pocketed after the trial. (Notation: Some of the math in this is incorrect, only the point remains valid: She walked away with less than him after legal fees.)
monkey_monkey_monkey
Not Their Skillets!
I have a client who collects bandage iron skillets of diverse sizes, shapes, designs, etc. Overall, he has a rather large collection that he is very proud of, and nosotros are currently in litigation because his married woman wants half of the collection. He offered her cash for half of the value of the collection, but she doesn't want the money. She simply wants to tear him up a little.
Terevok
No Respect for His Time
My customer had belatedly-stage lung cancer and didn't know how long he had to live. His one-time wife had a rich new husband and took him back to court to get more custody — because he was sometimes late dropping off the kids and wasn't "respectful of her fourth dimension."
hopelesslyhomeless
Worst Vulture Always
My customer's wife was dying of cancer. The family was worth $50 million. Both parties were doctors, but the wife earned near of the coin. His strategy was to delay until she died, because if she died before the divorce was final, he would become everything. She wanted to donate a chunk of her half of the coin to her hospital, leave information technology to her kids, etc.
Nosotros fired him — there is only so much you can condone, fifty-fifty equally a lowly divorce chaser. He institute another chaser to do it. His plan worked. What a jerk this guy was.
MorningDewProcess
Messing with Their Kid's Future
The worst I've seen was my foreman, a fifty-plus-twelvemonth-old dude. His married woman basically managed the finances because she spoke the most English and worked fewer hours than him. Well, unknown to him, she had stopped paying the bills and was hiding any messages that came, so he was clueless. Everything was on his credit since she had destroyed her credit with credit cards. The reason she did all this was because she was preparing to divorce him if he establish out she was adulterous on him with the teacher of a course she was taking.
Well, one day information technology all striking the fan when i of the kids constitute a hidden phone with pictures of the wife and her lover. This broke him. The guy couldn't work like he used to. The all-time foreman we had was basically unable to practise annihilation without blowing upwards. He too constantly had to get out work to pick upward his kids from school since they started having issues.
Divorce court finally rolled around, and he got striking hard. She had taken a lower-paying job, even though she had a degree this guy basically paid for her to get. At that time, we were working ridiculous overtime on an IDIOT job well, and that'due south the income they used, then he also got stuck with all the debt and bills. On top of losing his pension to her, his kids couldn't become to college because she took the money they set up aside for that. Finally, the guy simply started to get foreclosed last month.
JZTres
Making Matters Worse
I represented the married woman, and the husband was just a lazy human beingness. He didn't have a job for the last two years, he didn't want custody or even visitation of their two kids, and he refused to pay any kid support.
Basically, the example should have been wrapped up nice and clean. They had already washed all the number crunching on assets and whatnot. The married woman was basically like, "Fine. If you don't want to see your kids or pay child support, I work and will back up them. I'm just washed with you."
And so, the hubby came forward and claimed he felt responsible and wanted to pay some child back up, even though the agreement didn't require him to as he didn't see a certain income threshold. Information technology turned out to be a ruse to phone call out the married woman for hiding assets that didn't be. The judge had the lawyers go talk it over for about 2 hours, which bumped up the billable hours.
The husband'south lawyer was side by side to incompetent, as we already had the paper the husband signed and notarized saying they accustomed the asset findings to be true. When we went back to the guess, he basically said you already acknowledged this deal. Nothing is changing, except now I'chiliad making y'all pay kid back up, you lazy fool.
bofoshow51
Three Strikes, You're Out
The husband and wife were extremely well off, and the husband was a baseball fanatic who nerveless baseball bats from major MLB stars, past and present. The wife would always deride him throughout the course of their relationship well-nigh his stupid bat collection, which grew to be quite substantial during their relationship.
When they began the divorce process, the wife said she wanted half of the bats. The husband countered with an offer to give her half the bats' worth, plus $l,000. The wife insisted on one-half the bat collection itself and non monetary compensation for their assessed value. Because they couldn't come to an understanding, the judge used his discretion to divide upwards the bats. The wife probably put her half into a woodchipper at the finish of the solar day.
Warrior315
Ashes to Ashes
I had a husband and wife go toe-to-toe over an ashtray they got in Vegas at some betoken — neither smoked, strangely plenty. They spent nearly $5,000 for me and another attorney to duke it out in courtroom over the silly thing. Prior to proceeding, I explained what the toll would exist to contend over something silly like this and that he could requite me $2,500, and I would wing to Vegas for the weekend and get him an identical one instead.
He said he didn't care about the cost considering he intended to boom information technology on the courthouse steps in front of her if we won. We won, and he followed through with the smashing. He laughed and said the look on her confront was worth much more than $2,500.
Source
A Happy Catastrophe?
I once represented a husband who was divorcing his wife of 35-plus years. They were in their late 60s. At arbitration, they divided upward about half a million in assets within 30 minutes. So they spent 2.5 hours fighting over two hurricane glasses from Pat O'Brien'south and a pitchfork.
The mediator insisted the wife actually wanted the pitchfork, considering it was a gift from her daddy. The husband insisted they bought it at Domicile Depot two years agone. They finally settled at arbitration later on spending more than than $i,000 in chaser fees combined for the glasses and pitchfork. The best part? They remarried three months afterwards.
LazyMFTX
A Life Changing Discovery
Our client was married to a woman for xiv years, and they supposedly had 3 kids together who were ages 12, x and viii. Rumors started to spread that his wife cheated on him for years and that another man was the father of the 10-year-one-time and the 8-yr-old.
A blood test was done, and our customer was only the father of the oldest kid. He had been raising and financially supporting kids of some other man and his adulterous spouse for well-nigh a decade. The wife knew the whole time they weren't his kids. I really felt for the guy.
OhWeO
Crushing Their Kids' Dreams
The parents had divorced, and the female parent was my client. She wasn't going to apply for sole custody until the father texted her with a threat: "If you utilize for full custody, I will take the kids to Lebanese republic and y'all will never notice us." She got full custody and full control of the children's passports, and the male parent tin can no longer travel with the children.
The divorce agreement stipulated equal payment for any and all activities kids were involved in. The oldest boy wanted to play baseball game, but the father refused to pay, saying, "No son of mine volition play baseball." That father was the virtually selfish, irrational person I've ever met. He didn't deserve to exist a dad to those sweet kids.
elmnight
Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto
I represented a adult female who was convinced that her married man had implanted micro robots in her brain and was trying to command her. She would bring u.s. all these nanotech articles trying to convince us that it was possible. She dragged the case out for four years, convinced that he had done all kinds of illegal stuff — destroyed her automobile brakes and so she would crash, put poisonous substance in her tap h2o, etc. She was nuts. We almost had to become a conservator for her estate.
Source
A Lonely Path to Poor Life Decisions
Ane divorce involved an elderly couple who had both recently been widowed. They had both been married to their individual spouses for more 40 years. They married each other out of loneliness. Almost two years into the spousal relationship, they realized they fabricated a huge error. They couldn't stand up each other. It was weird seeing 80-year-olds complaining virtually the same things yous see kids arguing about.
eljefe1676
Fabricated an Offer He Couldn't Pass up
A previous customer was ticked his wife was cheating on him. She wanted a not-contested divorce, and she wanted to use my dominate specifically because she knew he was a great lawyer. He pretended to go along with her terms, and then he contacted us literally ii days before his wife and retained the states. He said he didn't care how much coin the servant was. He wanted my boss and so his wife couldn't have him equally a lawyer. He called and paid outset, so he won that battle.
PetiteChaos
Who Knew Toilet Paper Could Be a Deal Breaker?
My client was the outrageous one, then my center went out to his poor wife. He had OCD, which manifested primarily financially, so he made their lives a penny-pinching hell. Example: He was obsessed with fugitive unnecessary driving due to wearable and tear on the motorcar, gas expenses, etc., so he cutting the whole family'due south hair at abode and never let them eat at a eatery or go to the movies.
Weirdest of all, he kept ane toilet paper roll on him at all times, and you had to get one square from him earlier you lot could get to the bath. He never gave you lot more ane square. The wife finally got fed upwardly and left him when he gave her bangs during an in-home haircut, and their daughter was and then traumatized by the toilet paper thing that they couldn't potty railroad train her.
Also, he HATED paying his divorce lawyer nib. He was an one-time-fashioned mega-Catholic who considered divorce a deadly sin, so he viewed my whole job as an unnecessary (and sinful) expense.
Julietcaravello1
A Judge on the Dark Side
It's not the most outrageous, only I had a client incur about 20 additional hours of billable hours because he and his ex-married woman were battling and went to trial over their Star Wars collection. This was the but issue at trial. They were able to work out custody, child support, the house, but the Star Wars collection went to trial.
The approximate ended upwardly splitting it in the almost horrible style possible, basically giving each side half of what they wanted and then mixing and matching everything else and breaking upwardly "collections." When speaking about it at a briefing, the judge admitted she did information technology because if they were going to act similar children, she would care for them like children.
However, the value of this drove was more than $100,000, and then it was hardly "kids' stuff." Neither side had information technology in them to appeal, nor was the example law on either ane's side, given judicial discretion in belongings distribution.
Source
A Tradeoff of Junk
He was frustrated past her hoarding. She was frustrated by his utter uselessness. He filed for divorce, and she was my customer. Her prized possession was a room or two total of scrapbooking materials. His prized possession was a chiliad total of junk cars that he never worked on. They had no children and no real avails.
They hated each other more than any two people I'd ever met, and the only terms they would hold to were that he would get the scrapbooking stuff, and she would get the cars. My client as well got the house, every bit he had no income and didn't want it anyway.
It was the shortest divorce decree I e'er drafted. I intentionally squeezed it onto one page, and the judge and I had a good laugh over it. One time the decree was signed and filed, she hauled all the scrapbooking stuff to the yard, and he removed it to the dump. She then chosen a junk store I referred her to and had all of his cars removed from the one thousand.
schmerpmerp
Wasted No Fourth dimension Moving On
A 46-year marriage was broken up because his old high school girlfriend was single once more. Nosotros represented the wife. I learned later the guy married the sometime girlfriend THE SAME DAY the divorce was finalized.
SquirrelMcPants
Non Supposed to Happen in Jail
We nonetheless refer to it every bit "The Soulmate Case," simply a married woman, with children ranging from 5 to 11 years sometime, got locked upward for DUI on a Saturday nighttime. What that means is she was stuck there till a bail review on Monday morning. She was released, and on the car ride back to the house, she told her husband and kids, "I've found my soulmate, and I want you all to be happy for me."
What? It's absolutely insane to call back that in those few hours backside bars, this woman had get infatuated with an inmate. She wanted goose egg to practice with the kids, and a magistrate granted a non-express divorce with full custody and rights going to the father.
Source
Pedal to the Metal
For whatever reason, being married lowered this couple'southward power to get a mid-range motorcar loan. They were told by a banking company that if they weren't married, their chances of getting the loan would exist college. (I don't know — perchance one spouse had really bad credit, and they applied together. I'k not sure. It never sounded correct to me.)
They came to my office asking how much a divorce was. I just want to emphasize that this wasn't to avoid bankruptcy or anything. They literally were going to divorce and then they could buy a $20k car.
For whatever reason, being married lowered this couple'due south ability to go a mid-range auto loan. They were told past a bank that if they weren't married, their chances of getting the loan would be higher. (I don't know — maybe one spouse had actually bad credit, and they practical together. I'thousand not sure. It never sounded correct to me.)
They came to my office asking how much a divorce was. I just want to emphasize that this wasn't to avoid bankruptcy or annihilation. They literally were going to divorce so they could purchase a $20,000 car.
krendyB
Blaming It All on Sentimental Value
I had a instance where neither side would follow the court's orders. When they had to go dorsum to courtroom, they were fighting over a pistol and the human being'south grandmother's bowls. I assumed for weeks that these bowls were some sort of heirloom or expensive china. When they finally brought the bowls in to bandy, they were Tupperware!
Carcharodons
Talk Near a Transfer!
Wife and Husband No. 1 divorced with a child, and the married woman got custody of the child. Husband No. 1 paid child support. The wife married Husband No. 2, and he adopted the child. Husband No. ane was no longer on the hook for child support, every bit Husband No. two was and so legally the begetter.
The wife and Hubby No. 2 divorced. Considering of the adoption, Husband No. 2 had to pay child support for the child. The wife remarried Husband No. 1, so the kid then lived with Married man No. 1 (the biological father). Husband No. 2 (the adoptive father) withal had to pay child support! Insane!
BrownDog52469
Source: https://www.smarter.com/people/divorce-lawyers-share-stories-from-the-nastiest-cases?utm_content=params%3Ao%3D740011%26ad%3DdirN%26qo%3DserpIndex
0 Response to "Do I Need a Family Lawyer if My Case Is in My Favor"
Post a Comment